Analysis Overview

Framing and rhetorical patterns across analyzed articles

Dominant Frames

Distribution of framing across analyzed articles

Crisis
2205 (31.9%)
Conflict
1356 (19.6%)
Victim
771 (11.2%)
Security
525 (7.6%)
Accountability
361 (5.2%)
Threat
307 (4.4%)
Progress
211 (3.1%)
Responsibility
158 (2.3%)
Public Safety
151 (2.2%)
Horse Race
140 (2%)
Rhetorical Techniques

Technique categories across analyzed articles

Language Manipulation
26968 (31.4%)
Emotional Appeal
25686 (29.9%)
Credibility Tactic
20557 (23.9%)
Framing Device
12276 (14.3%)
Logical Fallacy
409 (0.5%)
Emotional Appeals

Specific emotions evoked across analyzed articles

Fear
8895 (34.6%)
Outrage
3270 (12.7%)
Anxiety
2829 (11%)
Sympathy
2514 (9.8%)
Anger
2309 (9%)
Loaded Language
1171 (4.6%)
Disgust
1092 (4.3%)
Contempt
834 (3.2%)
Sadness
686 (2.7%)
Pride
451 (1.8%)
Article Strategies

Strategic intent of analyzed articles

Alarm
2820 (40.8%)
Inform
2233 (32.3%)
Attack
1097 (15.9%)
Defend
577 (8.4%)
Mobilize
181 (2.6%)
Influence Targets

Targets of influence with pro/anti stance breakdown

Government of Iran
5 / 50 (4.2%)
Donald Trump
7 / 31 (2.9%)
Keir Starmer
31 / 6 (2.8%)
Iran
2 / 26 (2.1%)
Labour Party
8 / 6 (1.1%)
vaccination
11 / 0 (0.8%)
University of Kent
9 / 2 (0.8%)
Pro Anti