Analysis Overview

Framing and rhetorical patterns across analyzed articles

Dominant Frames

Distribution of framing across analyzed articles

Crisis
2211 (32%)
Conflict
1358 (19.7%)
Victim
771 (11.2%)
Security
525 (7.6%)
Accountability
361 (5.2%)
Threat
307 (4.4%)
Progress
211 (3.1%)
Responsibility
158 (2.3%)
Public Safety
147 (2.1%)
Horse Race
140 (2%)
Rhetorical Techniques

Technique categories across analyzed articles

Language Manipulation
26962 (31.4%)
Emotional Appeal
25716 (29.9%)
Credibility Tactic
20557 (23.9%)
Framing Device
12284 (14.3%)
Logical Fallacy
409 (0.5%)
Emotional Appeals

Specific emotions evoked across analyzed articles

Fear
8911 (34.7%)
Outrage
3269 (12.7%)
Anxiety
2833 (11%)
Sympathy
2522 (9.8%)
Anger
2310 (9%)
Loaded Language
1171 (4.6%)
Disgust
1092 (4.2%)
Contempt
837 (3.3%)
Sadness
688 (2.7%)
Pride
451 (1.8%)
Article Strategies

Strategic intent of analyzed articles

Alarm
2824 (40.9%)
Inform
2228 (32.2%)
Attack
1098 (15.9%)
Defend
579 (8.4%)
Mobilize
181 (2.6%)
Influence Targets

Targets of influence with pro/anti stance breakdown

Government of Iran
5 / 51 (4.2%)
Donald Trump
8 / 33 (3%)
Keir Starmer
32 / 7 (2.9%)
Iran
2 / 26 (2.1%)
Labour Party
8 / 6 (1%)
vaccination
11 / 0 (0.8%)
University of Kent
9 / 2 (0.8%)
Pro Anti